Welcome to the nuances of the English language and colloquialisms.

But still, it's been said more than you said it was in your app thread.

I was completely unaware of said product. I could see no reason why a milk based product would be named after a fundamental particle. You didn't outsmart me, you showed there was a gap in my knowledge of cheeses, a subject area that I don't profess to be an expert in.

Schlurbi: 1
Kyhas: 1
Everyone else: 0
The competition has finally been kick-started by Kyhas and Schlurbi.

apparently I didn't earn a point for pointing out spelling mistakes when schlubs did, this is unfair.

I'm on two god damn it!

Gaps in knowledge are what result in people being outsmarted.

Game is dumb, people cant keep track of scores.

it is the pair or stars and not a system
red
four
it isnt, i dont have any
5:02 right now.

May I roll my eyes some more now?

As I said, you haven't outsmarted me as I didn't claim to be knowledgeable in said area, I was simply enquiring as to how it was connected in a slightly odd way. So basically you score a point if I ask a question is what you say, a completely bogus idea and opposite to the concept of outsmarting, as intelligence is gained through learning, and by doing so you are stalling the process of learning, thus making outsmarting a frivolous exercise.

Birds don't use thermodynamics, they use thermals. Thermals are a phenomenon cause by a very small area of thermodynamics, and therefore the link made was one that is dubious at best for the word association game (there is a limit to the distance between to things as otherwise you could say anything then make a really long link).

Claiming that you are outsmarting me by asking things I can't possibly know is pointless. You are proving I am not psychic, not that you are smarter than me.

Not knowing the timezone isn't really smarter than me, I said about 4am and was within an hour, which is close enough to be useful. I could have just looked it up, but didn't.

Also;



Come back when you have a real challenge. I will only accept it if you can outsmart me in something I claim to be knowledgeable about, which is pretty much Physics to the level I have studied. There are further clauses too, it's only outsmarting if I actually claim to be completely right or nearly sure.

Nannal: 6
Schlurbi: 2
Kyhas: 1
Everyone else: 0
I keep the scores or you are deducted by 1 point.

You heard him, give up!

Shadow can't count either.

First, Schlurbi took Nannal's original point, which he has now somehow kept while Nannal got his back, and then another one for nothing. Even Nannal agreed he only got 4 from his last thing, bringing him to a total of 5.

So that makes an extra 2 points out of nowhere one top of the 7 that already exist for stupid reasons that aren't really outsmarting.

FAIL.

Nannal: 6
Schlurbi: 2
Kyhas: 1
Skillers: -1 for questioning the rules.
Eveyone else: get a point.

So much for not being biased.

Basically, I can't win because you don't want me to, and therefore you won't ever give me a point. Also, you have now made a rule that means that if I question this I immediately lose a point for disagreeing with you. When I point out that you fail at scorekeeping I lose a point and the scores aren't rectified to reflect the truth.

DOUBLE FAIL!

Nannal: 7
Schlurbi: 2
Kyhas: 1
Skillers: -2 for again questioning the rules.
Note to Skillers: outsmarting yourself = point. Making irrelevant comments and questioning the scores = -point.
Rule no.1 - Random scores = win.

[TCHS] Tanith: Hey skillers do you know which ethical theory peter singer is famous for?
My cake is assured
http://www.theskillers.co.uk says:
animal liberation
Nannal says:
No, although he is in favor of it because he is awesome
Its actually "preferance utilitarianism"

Nannal: 8
Rest: read above.

Metritutus: 1 for previous statement.
Hawke- -1 for triple posting.

Heh, I outsmart myself all the time, it's how I do work and progress.

Those rules are stupid and make this game completely pointless and some form of pathetic ego experiment.

Also, Nannal's points are no going up for no reason.

You seriously FAIL at making decent games that actually make sense.

Also, I noticed this about the first post;



No I didn't. I think it's pointless and frivolous. I do, however, welcome an intellectual challenge on a subject that I am knowledgeable on, it incites thinking and growth of intelligence, which I enjoy.

Can only see the top half but it reads



So that's 1 point for ever key I press and +5 for the picture and "epic post"

Nannal: 260000000

What statement?

Also, should be -2, 1 for each extra post, really.

Anyway, I would like to thank Nannal for participating in this glorious victory with my.

You see, by allying myself with Nannal I have assure I am now on the winning side, because he will amass an unbeatable score very quickly because of my actions. Naturally I only did this because I stood to gain by doing so, as he has agreed that this is an alliance.

So, in doing so I have outsmarted the game and all other participants within it.

Also, before you make up some rule against such action, there was no rule against such action when it occurred and it is therefore a completely valid method. I have locked all your previous posts to prevent you retroactively adding it.

That, my friends, is how to properly outsmart someone!

Thank you, and goodbye.